Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin


Home / Archives / Vol 47 No 3 (2021) / Research Articles

Patients’ Satisfaction: Nursing Care at Selected Tertiary Level Hospitals in Dhaka


Md Harun Ur Rashid Gazi
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Md Jashim Uddin Mazumder
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Anwar Parvez
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Hasina Akter
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Bithika Mali
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Keywords: Patient satisfaction, Patient dissatisfaction, Nursing care, Quality of nursing care.

DOI: 10.3329/bmrcb.v47i3.59246

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction with nursing care is an important goal of any healthcare organisation. If the nursing care is not of high quality, the hospital will fail in its responsibility of providing patient care. High quality nursing care is not ensured when the patient feels dissatisfied.

Objective: This study examined the level of patient’s satisfaction regarding nursing care at four selected tertiary level hospitals in Dhaka city.

Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted during September-October, 2019, through face-to-face interview using structured questionnaires. A total of 384 admitted patients from different wards were recruited conveniently. Patient’s satisfaction was measured using Patient Satisfaction with Quality Nursing Care Questionnaire (PSQNCQ-17) and Socio-demographic Questionnaire (SDQ-12).

Results: The mean score of patient satisfaction regarding nursing care was at 2.78 (SD=.68) out of maximum of 4 points which indicated moderate level of satisfaction. Findings also showed that place of study (p = .006), duration of stay in hospital (p = .02) and category of bed (p = .04) were significantly positively correlated with patient satisfaction regarding nursing care. Logistic regression analysis reveals that study places were significant (OR = .576, p = .02) among other independent variables in predicting the likelihood of patient satisfaction with nursing care.

Conclusion: Patients showed a moderate level of satisfaction regarding nursing care. However, place of study, duration of stay in hospital and category of bed were identified as factors influencing patients’ satisfaction regarding nursing care. These findings suggest that hospital policy along with in-service education and training are needed to enhance nurses’ competencies to improve the patient satisfaction regarding nursing care.

Keywords: Patient satisfaction, Patient dissatisfaction, Nursing care, Quality of nursing care.

Introduction

Patients’ satisfaction has been considered to be the most important measurement for overall satisfaction with hospital care and an important goal of any healthcare organisation.1 Patient satisfaction is the critical determinant for the assessment and management of high-quality nursing care.2 According to Donabedian, patient satisfaction is an expression of patient’s judgment on the quality of care in all its aspects, but particularly as concerns the interpersonal process. 3 The most influential factors of patients’

satisfaction with hospital care is especially associated with their satisfaction with nursing care; because nurses provide care for patients 24 hours a day.4 Previous study reported that satisfaction influences whether a person seeks medical advice, complies with treatment and maintains a continuing relationship with nursing care providers.5-6 Nursing care is an important aspect of healthcare services.7-9 High quality nursing care is not ensured when the patient feels dissatisfied. Patient satisfaction increases in an organisation where more personalised nursing care is given.10 Studies have shown that satisfaction with nursing care is the best indicator of patients’ satisfaction with healthcare facilities. Patient satisfaction is mainly determined by provider’s attitude and caring rather than technical skills.

However, nursing care is the significant components in the health care and it can reduce re-hospitalisation, improve quality of life and provide patient satisfaction. Yeakel et al found that helping the patients in monitoring personal hygiene, helping in nutrition, environmental sanitation, examination, maintaining body temperature, providing safety and comfort, helping in respiration, rest, sleep and exercise, and providing health education greatly increase the patient’s satisfaction. If the nursing care is not of high quality, the hospital will fail in its responsibility of providing care.12 Quality assessment can be used to analyse the outcomes of interpersonal interactions between the nurses and the patient throughout the care process.14-16 The level of inpatient satisfaction with nursing care was low. Study conducted by Dzomeku et al showed that hospitalised patients were less informed about their disease condition, treatment, and prognosis by nurses.4 Researchers have showed that the satisfied patients had better compliance with the treatment and nursing care plans.17

Patient’s satisfaction is one of the two main components of quality of care which includes respect for the patient and understanding the basic needs of the patients and providing nursing care accordingly. Previous study pointed out that most of the patients made complaints and expressed their dissatisfactions with respect to hospital healthcare deliveries, particularly nursing care services.18 Prior study showed that the aspects with which patients were least satisfied were the amount and type of information they received regarding their condition and treatment and also the amount nurses knew about patients’ care. 19 Various dimensions of patient satisfaction have been identified ranging from admission to discharge services as well as from medical care to interpersonal communication. These include responsiveness, communication, attitude, clinical skill, amenities, and food service.20-21 Respect, safety and understandable instructions are common factors associated with patient satisfaction towards nursing care.22

The findings of this study would contribute to develop in-service education and training based on dimensions of nursing care for nurses to improve the patient satisfaction. Based on above discussion it is concluded that measurement of patient’s satisfaction is an important tool to assess the quality of nursing care. It is necessary to increase the quality of nursing care with regards to ensure patient’s satisfaction. However, there was a dearth of study conducted that shows the level of patient satisfaction with nursing care in the hospital. Therefore, this study was aimed to examine the level of patients’ satisfaction and to identify the associated factors towards nursing care at four selected tertiary care hospitals in Dhaka city.

Materials and Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted during September to October 2019. The participants were 384 hospitalised patients recruited from four selected tertiary level hospitals in Dhaka city in Bangladesh. The selected hospitals were Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Hospital (BSMMUH), Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH), Sir Salimullha Medical College Hospital (SSMCH), and Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital (SSMCH). All patients admitted at general medicine and surgery wards were selected conveniently. The patients who were admitted for at least two weeks, who had ability to speak, read, write and understand Bangla language and who were conscious were included into the study. The subjects who were seriously ill or unconscious were excluded from the study. A total of 980 medical-surgical beds were allocated in those hospitals. However, 96 admitted patients were selected as participants for this study. The sample size was calculated by using the following formula: $$n = \frac{z^2(p\times q)}{d^2}$$ where, n= desired sample size, z= standard normal deviate set at 1.96, p= estimated to be at 50% level 50%=0.5, q= 1-p, d= degree of accuracy set at 5%=0.05. The calculated sample size was 384.

The patients’ satisfaction was measured using a 17 item previously validated Patients Satisfaction with Nursing Care Quality Questionnaire (PSNCQQ) developed by Laschinger et al. The subjects were asked to rate their opinion with 4-point Likert scale ranging from 4 = highly satisfied, to 1 = dissatisfied. Respondents were received a total of between 17 to 68 points, which was then be converted into a percentage. The higher scores indicated the higher level of satisfaction. The Chronbach’s alpha reliability of patients’ satisfaction regarding nursing care questionnaire was yielded at 94.4 in previous study. Internal consistency and reliability of this questionnaire was yielded at the Chronbach’s alpha value of 96.6 in current study. Patients’ characteristics were assessed using an 11 items patients’ Socio- Demographic Questionnaire (SDQ).

Prior to data collection, the study was approved by the BSMMU Institutional Review Board in Dhaka with financial support. With the IRB approval, the researcher asked for permission from the concern authorities of the respective hospitals. Researcher communicated with Director, Nursing Superintendents and In Charge Nurses on the selected wards of the targeted hospitals to interview the patients. Then researcher briefly introduced about the purpose of the study to the patients. The interested participants were invited to take part in the face-to-face interview. Participants were needed approximately 30 minutes to complete the questionnaire. All hospitalised patients were invited to participate in the interview. Ninety six patients from each of the hospital were finally agreed to participate. A total of 384 respondents completed the interview. Their participation was completely voluntary and anonymity was guaranteed. Patients could be stopped or withdrawn their participation from the study at any time without showing any reason. All collected data from the subjects were kept confidential.

The data were analysed using SPSS version 21.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patients’ satisfaction and characteristics. Chai square test was used to compare the association between socio-demographic characteristics and satisfaction. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors influencing patient’s satisfaction. Significant bivariate correlates of the dependent variable were entered as potential factors in the regression model. Enter method was used to fit the model. A value of p = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 37.70 (SD = 12.43) ranging from 16 to 65 years old and most of them (52.3%) were in the age group of less than 37 years. Above half (52.3%) of the patients were male and majority (89.6%) of them were Muslims. More than half (55.5%) of the participants were residing in village whereas above quarter (27.1%) of them were living in an urban area. Considering education, above half of the patients (55.4%) had primary to SSC. However, few participants (14.8%) had no education. Regarding occupation, nearly one third (31.3%) of the participants were housewife, and 16.0% of them had others occupation. The mean monthly family income of the participants was 17200.52 (SD=8587.06) taka. Data were collected from the patients admitted in medicine unit (27.6%), surgery unit (26.3%), neuro-medicine unit (24.7%) and orthopedic unit (21.4%). Majority of the patients (67.7%) were admitted in non-paying bed and most of them (74.0%) had no history of previous admission. The mean duration of stay in hospital was 8.67 (SD=5.94) ranging from 1 to 30 days. Most of the patients’ (64.8%) length of stay in hospital was less than 8 days (table I).

Variables

Category

N

%

x±SD

Age in Years

< 37

201

52.3

37.70±12.43

 

>37

183

47.7

 

Sex

Male

200

52.1

 

 

Female

184

47.9

 

Religion

Muslim

344

89.6

 

 

Hindu

36

9.4

 

 

Christian

04

1.0

 

Residence

Village

213

55.5

 

 

Suburban

67

17.4

 

 

Urban

104

27.1

 

Education

Illiterate

57

14.8

 

 

Primary

122

31.8

 

 

SSC

90

23.4

 

 

HSC

70

18.2

 

 

Bachelor degree

36

9.4

 

 

Master and above

09

2.3

 

Occupation

Service

87

22.7

 

 

Business

44

11.5

 

 

Housewife

120

31.3

 

 

Cultivator

49

12.8

 

 

Day labor

20

5.2

 

 

Others

64

16.7

 

Monthly family income

< 10000

137

35.7

17200.52±8587.06

 

10000 - 30000

224

58.3

 

 

> 30000

23

6.0

 

Place of study

BSMMU

96

25.0

 

 

DMCH

96

25.0

 

 

SSMCH

96

25.0

 

 

SHMCH

96

25.0

 

Ward types

Medicine

106

27.6

 

 

Surgery

101

26.3

 

 

Orthopedic

82

21.4

 

 

Neuro-medicine

95

24.7

 

Bed category

Paying

124

32.3

 

 

Non-Paying

260

67.7

 

Previous admission

No

284

74.0

 

Duration of stay in Hosp.

< 8 days

249

64.8

8.67±5.94

 

> 8 days

135

35.2

 


The mean score of patient satisfaction regarding nursing care was 2.74 (SD =.68) out of maximum of 4 points indicating moderate level. Based on item analysis, most of the patients (84.4%) were satisfied and stated that nurses were courteous and treated patient with dignity and respect. About 79.4% of the patients were satisfied with the waiting time to meet with a nurse. Approximately 85.8% patients reported that nurses were willingness to give answer of the patient’s questions. Majority of the participants (83.6%) became satisfied with the nurses’ behavior and majority of them (88.8%) were unsatisfied about nurses’ use of computer for report and treatment (table II).

Items

Dissatisfied

Neutral

Satisfied

Highly Satisfied

x̄±SD

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Nurses are courteous and treated patient with dignity and respect.

33

8.6

27

7.0

218

56.8

106

27.6

3.03±.83

The wait time to meet a nurse.

33

8.6

46

12.0

206

53.6

99

25.8

2.97±.85

Willingness of nurses to give answer of patient’s questions.

32

8.3

42

10.9

226

58.9

84

26.9

2.94±.81

Nurses behaviors with the patient

35

9.1

28

7.3

235

61.2

86

22.4

2.97±.81

Maintain privacy of the patient

39

10.2

39

10.2

215

56.0

91

23.7

2.93±.86

Explanations about tests, treatments of the patient.

33

8.6

78

20.3

195

50.8

78

20.3

2.83±.85

Time allowed for helping in care of patient.

43

16.2

84

21.9

173

45.1

84

21.9

2.78±.83

Give importance on patient’s thinking and choice.

42

10.9

50

13.0

206

53.6

86

22.4

2.88±.88

Ability of nurses to make comfortable of the patient

48

12.5

81

21.1

172

44.8

83

26.6

2.76±.93

Giving medicine and handling inter Venus procedure.

49

12.8

67

17.4

189

49.2

79

20.6

2.78±.91

Teamwork between nurses and other hospital staffs

46

12.0

38

9.9

216

56.3

84

21.9

2.88±.88

Hospital environment by the nurse

54

14.1

85

22.1

173

45.1

72

18.8

2.68±.93

Advice during discharge or transfer from hospital or another department.

46

12.0

81

21.1

180

46.9

77

20.1

2.75±.91

Overall quality of nursing care.

43

11.2

96

25.0

177

46.1

68

17.7

2.70±.88

nurses uses computer for report and treatment

36

9.4

305

79.4

29

7.6

14

3.6

2.05±.55

Nurses are skilled in communication technology

43

11.2

163

42.4

144

37.5

34

8.9

2.44±.80

Patient recommended this hospital for his family and friend on the base of nursing care

55

14.3

194

50.5

101

26.3

34

8.9

2.30±.82

Total mean

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.74±.68


Duration of stay in hospital was significantly correlated with patient satisfaction meaning that the patients who had stayed in hospital for less than 8 days (p = .02) were dissatisfied towards nursing care than those of patients who had stayed for more than 8 days. Findings also reveal that category of bed were significantly correlated with patient satisfaction toward nursing care (p = .04) meaning that non-paying

patients were mostly dissatisfied toward nursing care than those of paying patients. Considering place of study, patients admitted in BSMMU had greater satisfaction towards nursing care (p = .006) than those of patients admitted in other hospitals. However, age, gender, religion, education, income, residence, and admission unit were non-significant toward patient satisfaction regarding nursing care (table III).

Variable

Category Satisfaction with nursing care

c2

p

Dissatisfied n (%)

Satisfied n (%)

Total n (%)

Age in years

<37

122 (31.77)

79 (20.57)

201 (52.34)

.978

.18

 

>37

120 (31.25)

63 (16.40)

183 (47.66)

 

 

Gender

Male

132 (34.37)

68 (17.7)

200 (52.1)

1.59

.12

 

Female

110 (28.64)

74 (19.27)

184 (47.9)

 

 

Religion

Muslim

215 (55.98)

129 (33.59)

344 (89.6)

.384

.33

 

Non-Muslim

27 (7.03)

13 (3.38)

40 (10.41)

 

 

Occupation

Service

54 (14.10)

33 (8.60)

87 (22.7)

3.93

.26

 

Business

29 (7.60)

15 (3.90)

44 (11.5)

 

 

 

Housewife

68 (17.70)

52 (13.54)

120 (31.3)

 

 

 

Cultivator

91 (23.70)

42 (10.93)

133 (34.6)

 

 

Income in taka

<17200

148 (38.54)

93 (24.21)

241 (62.8)

.720

.23

 

>17200

94 (24.47)

49 (12.76)

143 (37.2)

 

 

Place of Study

BSMMU

51 (13.28)

45 (11.71)

96 (25.0)

10.593

.006

 

DMCH

62 (16.14)

34 (3.64)

96 (25.0)

 

 

 

SSMCH

57 (14.84)

39 (10.15)

96 (25.0)

 

 

 

SHMCH

72 (18.75)

24 (6.25)

96 (25.0)

 

 

Education

No education

36 (9.37)

21 (5.46)

57 (14.8)

.139

.93

 

Few education

132 (34.37)

80 (20.83)

212 (55.20)

 

 

 

Higher education

74 (19.27)

41 (10.67)

115 (29.94)

 

 

Residence

Rural

133 (34.63)

80 (20.83)

213 (55.5)

.069

.43

 

Urban

109 (28.38)

62 (16.14)

171 (44.5)

 

 

Duration of stay

< 8 days

166 (43.20)

83 (21.60)

249 (64.80)

4.04

.02

 

> 8 days

76 (19.80)

59 (15.40)

135 (35.20)

 

 

Admission unit

Medicine

65 (16.92)

41 (10.67)

106 (27.6)

1.206

.75

 

Surgery

61 (15.88)

40 (10.41)

101 (26.3)

 

 

 

Orthopedic

52 (13.54)

30 (7.81)

82 (21.4)

 

 

 

Neuromedicine

64 (16.66)

31 (8.06)

95 (24.7)

 

 

Category of bed

Paying

86 (22.39)

38 (8.89)

124 (32.3)

3.153

.04

 

Non-paying

156 (40.62)

104 (27.08)

260 (67.7)

 

 

Previous

Yes

68 (17.70)

32 (8.33)

100 (26.0)

1.438

.14

Admission

No

174 (45.31)

110 (28.64)

284 (74.0)

 

 

Occupation

Service

54 (14.10)

33 (8.60)

87 (22.7)

.069

.43

 

Business

29 (7.60)

15 (3.90)

44 (11.5)

 

 

 

Housewife

68 (17.70)

52 (13.54)

120 (31.3)

 

 

 

Cultivator

91 (23.70)

42 (10.93)

133 (34.6)

 

 


Logistic regression was used to establish the probability of satisfaction level of nursing care. Then predictive variables including the place of study, duration of stay in hospital, and category of bed were used in the analysis. The overall predictive model was statistically significant (p <.05). Only study place is significant among the independent variables in predicting the likelihood of patient satisfaction with nursing care. The odds of having the patients admitted in BSMMU was 57.0% higher satisfaction with nursing care (OR = .576) than those of other study place. The overall model and one predictor were statistically significant. The overall effect size was also modest, with Nagelkerke R2 equal to .038 (table IV).

Predictor

B

SE

Wald

p

OR

95% Cl, odds

Ratio

Lower

Upper

Category of Bed

.349

.235

2.203

.13

1.41

.844

2.248

Duration of stay

.384

.223

2.980

.08

1.46

.949

2.271

Study places

-.552

.240

5.318

.02

.576

.360

.920

Constant

-.583

.106

23.524

.000

 

 

 

Model (likelihood ration) chi-square = 10.890, df = 3, ,p < .001 Nagelkerke R2 = .038
Percent correctly classified = 63%


Discussion

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patients’ satisfaction regarding nursing care. The mean patient’s satisfaction was 2.74 which indicate moderate level of satisfaction among the patients which is inconsistent with the Malaysian study.28 The difference might be related to the different types of hospital that the study places of Malaysia were in teaching and research-based hospital that most of the nurses were professionally expertise and had adequate knowledge on technology for providing better nursing care. Study conducted in Ethiopia found highest patients’ mean (M=3.03, SD=.83) satisfaction toward nursing care than current study. The findings of Ethiopian study might be different from this study due to nurses become courteous and treated patient with dignity and respect or differences in organisational policy, nursing care delivery system, supervision and monitoring, in-service education and higher educational profile of nurses. Majority of the patients (83.0%) were satisfied with nurses’ behaviours. This finding was consistent with the study of Rafii et al and inconsistent with the findings of Wolf, Miller and Devine.30,31 The possible explanation might be due to inadequate nurse patient ratio or too much work load in the hospitals. Nurses’ communication with the patients is the most important behavior in providing nursing care to the patients. The mean explanation about tests, treatments of the patient towards satisfaction was 2.83, is lower than those of Black lion hospital (M=3.86) and Saints hospital (M= 3.26) in Malaysia.28

The mean patients’ satisfaction regarding hospital environment by the nurse and advice during discharge or transfer from hospital or another department is higher than study conducted by Karaca and Duma in 2019.18 This finding indicated that patients in present study were more satisfied than Karaca and Durna’s study. The inconsistent results may be due to differences in hospital regulations, structure, educational background and cultural context between two countries. Majority of the patients in this study were unsatisfied about nurses’ use of computer for report and treatment. This finding is similar with the previous study conducted by Mohanan in 2010.9 Present study found that patients in BSMMU hospitals were more satisfied with nursing care as compared to other government hospitals. Similar findings reported by Indian study of Sreenivas and Prasad in 2003, where it was found that patients were more satisfied in corporate managed hospitals than other hospitals.32 Therefore, it is recommended to plan and implement the training programs needed for nurses to improve their knowledge and skills of communication and use of emotional support measures for the patients.35

Place of study and category of bed were significantly correlated with patient satisfaction regarding nursing care. It means that the patients admitted in BSMMU and non-paying bed showed higher satisfaction towards nursing care than those of patients admitted in other study places and paying bed. In term of duration of stay in hospital, the patients who were admitted in less than 8 days were mostly dissatisfied toward nursing care. These findings are inconsistent with the previous study conducted by Belayneh due to differences in hospital policy, educational background, and hospital facilities.28

We used a convenience sample gathered in the day time, thus patients who were both admitted and discharged at night could not include in the study. Hospital policy including communication technology, treatment and diagnostic procedure, patient’s discharge, transfer and wait time need to be enhanced for increasing patient satisfaction. In-service education and training regarding nursing care based on dimension and process may be developed for nurses to increase the level of patient satisfaction. Furthermore, intervention study is recommended to develop hospital policy for patient satisfaction toward nursing care.

Conclusion

Patients showed a moderate level of satisfaction regarding nursing care. However, study places, category of bed and duration of stay in hospital were identified as major factors influencing patients satisfaction toward nursing care. These findings suggested that hospital policy along with in-service education and training is needed to enhance nurses’ competencies in order to improve the patient satisfaction regarding nursing care. Patients’ views have become an important element in the evaluation of health care. The nurses need to know what factors influence patient satisfaction, if we have to improve the quality of health care.

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude toward the Authority of BSMMU for providing me the research grant to conduct this study. I must acknowledge to all Physicians, nurses, staffs and the patients, who helped and allowed me to collect the data.

References

  1. Goh ML, Ang EN, Chan YH, He HG, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. A descriptive quantitative study on multi-ethnic patient satisfaction with nursing care measured by the Revised Humane Caring Scale. Applied Nursing Research. 2016; 31:126-31.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2016.02.002
  2. Schmidt LA. Patients’ perceptions of nursing care in the hospital setting. Journal of advanced nursing. 2003 ;44: 393-93.
    DOI: 10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02818
  3. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor. 1980
  4. Dzomeku VM, Ba-Etilayoo A, Perekuu T, Mantey RE. In patient satisfaction with nursing care: a case study at kwame nkrumah university of science and technology hospital. International Journal of Research in Medical and Health Sciences. 2013; 2:19-24
  5. Aiken Linda H, Sean PC, Douglas MS. Julie Sochalski, Jeffrey H. Silber. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA, 2002; 288: 1987-93. DOI:10.1001/jama.288.16.1987
  6. Asadi-Lari M, Tamburini M, Gray D. Patients’ needs, satisfaction, and health related quality of life: towards a comprehensive model. 2009
    Available from: www.hqlo.com/content/2/1/32
  7. Buchanan J, Dawkins P, Lindo JL. Satisfaction with nursing care in the emergency department of an urban hospital in the developing world: A pilot study. International emergency nursing. 2015;23:218-24
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.01.001
  8. Merkouris A, Andreadou A, Athini E, Hatzimbalasi M, Rovithis M, Papastavrou E. Assessment of patient satisfaction in public hospitals in Cyprus: a descriptive study. Health science journal. 2013;7:28
  9. Mohanan K, Kaur S, Das K, Bhalla A. Patient satisfaction regarding nursing care at Emergency Outpatient Department in a Tertiary care Hospital. J Ment Heal Hum Behav [Internet]. 2010:1-5.
  10. Johansson P, Oléni M, Fridlund B. Patient satisfaction with nursing care in the context of health care: a literature study. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. 2002;16:337-44.
    DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00094.x
  11. Yeakel S, Maljanian R, Bohannon RW, Coulombe KH. Nurse caring behaviors and patient satisfaction: improvement after a multifaceted staff intervention. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2003;33:434-6.
    DOI: 10.1097/00005110-200309000-00002
  12. Khan MH, Hassan HR, Anwar S, Babar TS, & Babar KS. Patient satisfaction with nursing care. Rawal Medical Journal. 2007; 32: 28-30
  13. Sharma SK, Kamra PK. Patient satisfaction with nursing care in public and private hospitals. International Journal of Nursing Care. 2013;1:134-9.
    DOI: 10.5958/j.2320-8651.1.2.049
  14. El-Nagger N, Ahmed S, Elsayed L, Khamis H. Patients’ satisfaction regarding nursing care provided in different hospitals in Makkah AL Mukramah. Life Science Journal. 2013;10:421-29.
  15. Abdel Maqsood AS, Oweis AI, Hasna FS. Differences between patients’ expectations and satisfaction with nursing care in a private hospital in Jordan. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2012;18:140-46.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02008.x
  16. Quinn GP, Jacobsen PB, Albrecht TL, Bell Ellison BA, Newman NW, Bell M, Ruckdeschel JC. Real-time patient satisfaction survey and improvement process. Hospital Topics. 2004;82:26-32
    DOI: 10.3200/HTPS.82.3.26-32
  17. Trout A, Magnusson AR, Hedges JR. Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: what does the literature say? Academic emergency medicine. 2000;7:695-709.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02050.x
  18. Karaca A, Durna Z. Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. Nursing Open. 2019;6 :535-45.
    DOI: 10.1002/nop2.237
  19. Chaka B. Adult patient satisfaction with nursing care. MPH thesis, department of community health, Addis Ababa University. 2005; 1: 23-34.
  20. Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed?. JAMA. 1988; 260:1743-48.
    DOI: 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743
  21. Tokunaga J, Imanaka Y, Nobutomo K. Effects of patient demands on satisfaction with Japanese hospital care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2000; 12:395-401.
    DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/12.5.395
  22. Boudreaux ED, Ary RD, Mandry CV, McCabe B. Determinants of patient satisfaction in a large, municipal ED: the role of demographic variables, visit characteristics, and patient perceptions. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2000;18:394-400.
    DOI: 10.1053/ajem.2000.7316
  23. Hall JA, Dornan MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Social science & medicine. 1990;30:811-8.
    DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90205-7
  24. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988: 25-36.
  25. Covinsky KE, Rosenthal GE, Chren MM, Justice AC, Fortinsky RH, Palmer RM, Landefeld CS. The relation between health status changes and patient satisfaction in older hospitalized medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1998;13: 223-9.
    DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00071.x
  26. Darja Jarosova J W Evaluation of patient satisfaction with nursing care. Profese. 2013;6:35-9.
    DOI: 10.5507/pol.2013.018
  27. Freitas JS, Silva AE, Minamisava R, Bezerra AL, Sousa MR. Quality of nursing care and satisfaction of patients attended at a teaching hospital. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem. 2014; 22:454-60.
    DOI: 10.1590/0104-1169.3241.2437
  28. Belayneh M. Inpatient satisfaction and associated factors towards nursing care at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Amhara regional state, Northwest Ethiopia. Global Journal of Medicine and Public Health. 2016; 5
  29. Woldeyohanes TR, Woldehaimanot TE, Kerie MW, Mengistie MA, Yesuf EA. Perceived patient satisfaction with in-patient services at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC research notes. 2015; 8: 285.
    DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1179-8
  30. Rafii F, Hajinezhad ME, Haghani H. Nurse caring in Iran and its relationship with patient satisfaction. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing.2008;26:75.
  31. Wolf ZR, Miller PA, Devine M. Relationship between nurse caring and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. MedSurg Nursing. 2003; 12:391-97.
  32. Sreenivas T, Prasad G. Patient satisfaction–a comparative study. J Acad Hosp Adm. 2003;15:7-12.
  33. Taner T, Antony J. Comparing public and private hospital care service quality in Turkey. Leadership in health services. 2006.
    DOI: 10.1108/13660750610664991
  34. Andaleeb SS. Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country. Social Science & Medicine. 2001; 52:1359-70.
    DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00235-5
  35. Ahmed T, Assefa N, Asrat Demisie AK. Levels of adult patients’ satisfaction with nursing care in selected public hospitals in Ethiopia. International journal of health sciences. 2014; 8:371.
Correspondence: Md. Harun Ur Rashid Gazi
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Shahbagh, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.
harunurrashid1@gmail.com
ORCID 0000-0003-1489-8723
Download

None


Submission
10 October 2020

Accepted
17 October 2021

Published
01 December 2021


Apply citation style format of Bangladesh Medical Research Council


Issue
Vol 47 No 3 (2021)

Section
Research Articles


Ethical Clearance
IRB of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.


Financial Support
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.


Conflict of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.


|| An open access, peer-revewed (single-blind) journal of the Bangladesh Medical Research Council ||

ISSN: 2224-7238 (Online) || ISSN: 0377-9238 (Print)